Comments on: Apache vs. IIS Web Server

By: mens leather jacket

mens leather jacket — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:58:31 +0000

but the links dont work on mac safary, firefox, chrome can you help me with that?

By: Nick

Nick — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:51:41 +0000

Let’s talk about the multitude of IIS security holes, it has proprietary meta data that is available after hacking it ( security? ), and that during development it is erradic, And routinely you have to run console commands to fix it during development. Errors are horribly undescriptive.

Can we say apache is easily configurable, has informative error messages, and has visible metadata.

I always use IIS, but to compare the too with a fox news type discussion. You should actually have a comparison and not a fanboy pledging.

By: Sai Krishna

Sai Krishna — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:22:43 +0000

Yes true. It only takes about IIS. May be its time to reconsider change the title ,
Between, thanks for the information on IIS

By: Bilal

Bilal — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:30:14 +0000

You forgot to mention about the licensing and price difference between the two server programs

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:15:37 +0000

To be honest doesn’t show both sides of the argument, all this article does is point IIS as a better option without a real comparison. IIS, beside its supossed superiority has massive security issues, this has not changed even with IIS7.